Kim Kardashian: Hollywood, is it a game? What have I done..

Kim Kardashian: Hollywood Is it a game? A question I thought would be simple to answer however after playing this app for a longer than I wished I still have my doubts. However, thanks to Jesper Juul I can come to a conclusion without losing my mind.





The simple fact is that I began to regret my choice almost immediately. I have played a few mobile games before. And this app shares some qualities. To start they are developed with money in mind. The game can’t exist without money true. Though mobile games like this exist to make money. For example, as many mobile games has a stamina system so does this app. Basically the game will dictate how many actions you may perform. This app wants you to purchase the ability to skip such time gates however if you were to continue to progress without them it would require you to wait. A premium K star currency is also present. Like most mobile apps, the premium currency is available in larger quantities in the beginning but begins to fall off as you progress squeezing the user to purchase them instead.

The app as far as the content is nothing special. The art style is not awful the cartoon look is ok but feels very odd. If Hollywood was an art style it would count as that. The dialog is nothing special either I confess I skipped most of it I got the basics of the story and only really needed to know what thing I needed to tap on next. Really my only reason to continue outside of completing this assignment was just to see what things money would fall out of next.

So, to address if this app could be considered a game I want to use the writing of Jesper Juul. “Play is a mostly free-form activity, whereas game is a rule based activity.” (28) This game had rules, I guess. You could only visit places it allowed. And you had objectives dictated to you. However, I don’t think this is enough. Thankfully Juul creates some terms that we can use to determine if something can be considered a game per him and his sources. These rules include “Rules, Variable and Valorization outcomes, player effort, player attached to outcome, negotiable consequences (in that nothing really affects you in real life) (36) These defining terms actually real help me understand this app.

I will only hit on some of Juuls keywords, those I feel can best show weather this app is a game.

Variable outcome is not present in this app. In that outcome at all is not present within this app. The game is meant to be continually played to maintain a score. I even looked it up and the score will fall over time forcing people to continue to ride the hamster wheel. Is a continued experience an outcome that can have be varied? I must say no.

Player effort is hard to find in my play sessions. Though I most definitely would say that anyone who’s goal of maintaining a high score would be putting in a massive amount of effort or money so I guess I will give it this one.

Playor attached to outcome, again I will have to give it this one as I did not feel attached to my score but I’m sure many people would care deeply if they lost points.

Lastly it would be Valorization or if the outcomes can be classified as positive and negative. Now this is a complex one. I feel that the game lacks outcome in general just a constipate play state in which you hhave to maintain your score or fear a penalty. So this would also be absent for the app.

In conclusion, I have to say tha1e0t, no I don’t consider this app a game. It is simply a time sink or cash grab with the skin of a game attached. The Perhaps if they set a limit to your score and added a you win or you lose message I might be swayed to think of it as a game. Instead we get a never-ending system created to extract time and money from the user until their “death”. In a way, it’s life in your phone a small slice of capitalistic life right in our pockets.

Juul, Jesper. Half-real: video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011.


5 thoughts on “Kim Kardashian: Hollywood, is it a game? What have I done..

  1. Careful of your syntax: in the first paragraph you should use your colons a bit more :::::, or at least when needed Kim Kardashian: Hollywood Is it a game? -> Kim Kardashian: Hollywood: Is it a game?. And try to embed your links, so that the first Kim Kardashian: Hollywood is the link to itunes instead of having that link be a strange solo line thing. Make it pretty! Substantively, I want to push back against your claim that valorization of an outcome is not present. This is a capitalist/consumer culture simulator. Buy things to raise your status. It’s exactly what being a celebrity in Capitalism is all about. Buy things; be seen; go to openings; etc. This simulates that same, as you say, hamster wheel. That you do not find the end result valorized indicates that you would not find that SAME thing valorized within real life. Do you? Would others?

    Liked by 1 person

  2. With consideration of Jesper Juul’s concepts my favorite part of your whole blog was explaining how the game is not a game using the words “It is simply a time sink or cash grab with the skin of a game attached.” It explains how the concept of the game has its own ulterior motive but I feel like discussing the politics behind video games leads to a whole new category.


  3. I would have to differ in opinion about the valorization I’ll comes in can Kardashian, because there is the ability to remain in the same level or move up… Now, I would agree that the game isn’t wel planned/produced, and it’s evident that the game was made to make money for everyone involved in the game’s concept and creation, which gives the game a cheesy feel to it.


  4. I enjoyed you’re perspective on the game because I feel it is very similar in a few ways. Even though I did not enjoy the game and thought it was poorly made I still considered it to be game because of the game like foundation it has even though its purpose to act as a foundation to rack in money. I would also be careful about using “I guess” in your statement about rules, because it is a bit contradicting when you later on say that there are a from of rules in place.


  5. You mentioned a bit about player attachment and said that some people would care deeply if they lost points. According to Jester Juul rules why would they care so deeply and what about the game would make them feel so attached?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s